Neuroepidemiology. Part II: Assessment of therapeutic trials
- 1 April 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of Neurology
- Vol. 19 (4) , 311-319
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410190402
Abstract
The gold standard for therapeutic trials is the randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study design. Lack of blindness and placebo makes tenuous the attribution of results to the specific agent; lack of randomization between concurrent and comparable groups makes it impossible. The chi‐square test of the null hypothesis of no difference between treatment groups is the best method of assessment, as no overall rating system used in neurology is a true numerical scale but at best a rank‐order scale. If quantitation of results is desired, a nonparametric rank‐order test is necessary. Results over time can be assessed with a logrank (life‐table) test for single events as end point, and by chi‐square or rank‐order tests for multiple events among individual patients.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- NeuroepidemiologyAnnals of Neurology, 1984
- Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosisNeurology, 1983
- On the Role of Clinicians in the Use of Drug Trial DataNeuroepidemiology, 1982
- Clinical biostatisticsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1977
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and designBritish Journal of Cancer, 1976
- STUDIES ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: 7. Correlates of Clinical Change in an Early BoutActa Neurologica Scandinavica, 1973
- ISONIAZID IN TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSISJAMA, 1957
- ISONIAZID IN TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSISJAMA, 1957