Patient Self-Monitoring of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
- Vol. 1 (4) , 245-251
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00129784-200101040-00003
Abstract
Coumarin derivatives are widely used oral anticoagulants for patients with chronic atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, valvular heart disease, myocardial infarction or a mechanical prosthetic heart valve. Because of the narrow therapeutic window associated with coumarins and the potential for drug interactions, frequent monitoring of anticoagulation is required to maintain the International Normalized Ratio (INR) between 2.0 to 3.5 for most clinical indications. Monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy is placing a considerable burden on healthcare providers because many patients require life-long treatment with coumarins, and because of an increasing number of elderly patients with conditions that are treated with coumarins. A novel approach that might, in part, address this healthcare need is patient self-monitoring of anticoagulation with a portable coagulometer. Several cohort studies and randomized controlled trials have found that anticoagulation self-monitoring is as good as, or better than, conventional monitoring in a specialized anticoagulation clinic or by a general practitioner. The advantages of anticoagulation self-monitoring include reduced patient inconvenience relating to anticoagulation clinic visits and laboratory monitoring of warfarin therapy, and fewer INR levels outside the therapeutic INR range if INR measurements are preformed more frequently with anticoagulation self-monitoring. Thus, anticoagulation self-monitoring has the potential to reduce the incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding episodes in patients who are receiving long term oral anticoagulant therapy. The potential drawbacks of anticoagulation self-monitoring include the costs of the portable coagulometer. Additionally, self-monitoring is limited to patients who have the cognitive and physical capabilities to perform the technique required for the portable coagulometer.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-Effectiveness of Self-Managed Anticoagulant Therapy in GermanySeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 1999
- Training of Patients for Self-Management of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy: Standards, Patient Suitability, and Clinical AspectsSeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 1999
- Accuracy of a Portable International Normalization Ratio Monitor in Outpatients Receiving Long-Term Oral Anticoagulant TherapyThrombosis Research, 1998
- Self management of oral anticoagulant therapy after heart valve replacementEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1997
- An Analysis of the Lowest Effective Intensity of Prophylactic Anticoagulation for Patients with Nonrheumatic Atrial FibrillationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Post-conference session: Experience with patient self-management of oral anticoagulationJournal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 1996
- Multicenter evaluation of a new capillary blood prothrombin time monitoring systemBlood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 1995
- Optimal Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Mechanical Heart ValvesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The Optimal Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous ThrombosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in elderly subjects (the Cardiovascular Health Study)The American Journal of Cardiology, 1994