TREES AND PUBLIC LIABILITY—WHO REALLY DECIDES WHAT IS REASONABLY SAFE?
- 1 December 2010
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Arboricultural Journal
- Vol. 33 (3) , 141-164
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03071375.2010.9747606
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perceptions of occupiers' liability risk by estate managersInternational Journal of Law in the Built Environment, 2010
- LIABILITY FOR DEATH OR INJURY CAUSED BY FALLING TREES OR BRANCHES: A REVIEW OF THE PRESENT POSITION UNDER ENGLISH LAW IN RELATION TO TREE SAFETY INSPECTIONArboricultural Journal, 2009
- Why, What, and How? Case Study on Law, Risk, and Decision Making as Necessary Themes in Built Environment TeachingJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 2009
- CURRENT ISSUES IN ARBORICULTURAL RISK ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENTArboricultural Journal, 2007
- TOWARDS REASONABLE TREE RISK DECISION-MAKING?Arboricultural Journal, 2007
- MOVING THE FOCUS FROM TREE DEFECTS TO RATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT—A PARADIGM SHIFT FOR TREE MANAGERSArboricultural Journal, 2007
- TOWARDS A NATIONAL STANDARD FOR TREE RISK INSPECTIONSArboricultural Journal, 2007
- I'LL MANAGE RISK MY WAYArboricultural Journal, 2007
- WHY RISK ASSESSMENT NEEDS AN UNDERPINNING PHILOSOPHYArboricultural Journal, 2007
- DANGEROUS TREES?Arboricultural Journal, 2007