Effect of test field size on the results of automated perimetry in normal subjects and patients with optic neuritis
- 27 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Ophthalmologica
- Vol. 69 (3) , 367-370
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1991.tb04829.x
Abstract
The mean sensitivities of the same 8 central test points were compared in two different programs of an automated Octopus perimeter in normal subjects and in patients recovered from optic neuritis (visual acuity 0.8 or better). The programs differed in terms of the size of the stimulated visual field. One program tested the central 30 degrees and the other, central 8.4-degree visual field. It was found that the mean sensitivity tended to become higher when stimulating small field size in both normal persons and patients with optic nauritis.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Perimetric Experience in Normal SubjectsArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1989
- Comparison of automated perimetry and pattern visually evoked cortical potentials in optic neuritisDocumenta Ophthalmologica, 1988
- Effect of Patient Experience on the Results of Automated Perimetry in Clinically Stable Glaucoma PatientsOphthalmology, 1988
- Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry Evidence for a learning effectActa Ophthalmologica, 1987
- Differential Light ThresholdArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1984
- STATIC PERIMETRY: ACCURACY AND FLUCTUATIONSActa Ophthalmologica, 1976