Why are physicians so skeptical about positive randomized controlled clinical trials in critical care medicine?
- 23 November 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 31 (2) , 196-204
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-004-2519-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Barriers to providing lung-protective ventilation to patients with acute lung injuryCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- From ventilator‐induced lung injury to physician‐induced lung injury: Why the reluctance to use small tidal volumes?Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2004
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic reviewBMJ, 2003
- The Pathophysiology and Treatment of SepsisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Risks and Benefits of Activated Protein C Treatment for Severe SepsisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Clinicians’ Approaches to Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Lung Injury and ARDSChest, 2001
- Evidence-Based Medicine in AnesthesiologyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2001
- Evidence-Based Medicine in AnesthesiologyPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2001
- Ventilation with Lower Tidal Volumes as Compared with Traditional Tidal Volumes for Acute Lung Injury and the Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Looking for the Evidence in MedicineScience, 1996