Predicting Excess Stock Returns Out of Sample: Can Anything Beat the Historical Average?
Top Cited Papers
- 20 November 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Review of Financial Studies
- Vol. 21 (4) , 1509-1531
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm055
Abstract
Goyal and Welch (2007) argue that the historical average excess stock return forecasts future excess stock returns better than regressions of excess returns on predictor variables. In this article, we show that many predictive regressions beat the historical average return, once weak restrictions are imposed on the signs of coefficients and return forecasts. The out-of-sample explanatory power is small, but nonetheless is economically meaningful for mean-variance investors. Even better results can be obtained by imposing the restrictions of steady-state valuation models, thereby removing the need to estimate the average from a short sample of volatile stock returns.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Dog That Did Not Bark: A Defense of Return PredictabilityThe Review of Financial Studies, 2007
- A Comprehensive Look at The Empirical Performance of Equity Premium PredictionThe Review of Financial Studies, 2007
- Stock Return Predictability: Is it There?The Review of Financial Studies, 2006
- Efficient tests of stock return predictability☆Journal of Financial Economics, 2006
- Optimal Inference in Regression Models with Nearly Integrated RegressorsEconometrica, 2006
- Predictive Regressions: A Reduced-Bias Estimation MethodJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2004
- Spurious Regressions in Financial Economics?The Journal of Finance, 2003
- Inference in Models with Nearly Integrated RegressorsEconometric Theory, 1995
- Predictable Stock Returns: The Role of Small Sample BiasThe Journal of Finance, 1993
- Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation and inference in dynamic models with time-varying covariancesEconometric Reviews, 1992