Smokers’ reactions to reduced ignition propensity cigarettes
- 24 January 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 15 (1) , 45-49
- https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.013532
Abstract
Background: On 28 June 2004, New York State (NY) became the first jurisdiction to require cigarettes to meet a reduced ignition propensity (RIP) standard. This law resulted in cigarette manufacturers modifying nearly all of their brands sold in NY. However, the same cigarette brands sold in other states were not modified to meet the RIP standard. Objectives: This paper examines relationships between the RIP law and smokers’ awareness of changes in the performance of their cigarettes (that is, going out more frequently, change in taste), and smoking behaviour. Methods: Data for this analysis come from a nationwide survey of 2088 adult smokers (> 18 years of age) conducted in the USA between July and December 2004. 143 of the smokers included in the survey were residents of NY while the remainder were from other states (n = 1945). Survey participants were asked whether their cigarettes “ever go out between puffs” and whether they had noticed any change in the taste of their cigarettes in the past 12 months. Results: NY smokers were three times more likely than smokers in other states to report that their cigarettes often went out between puffs (17.3% v 5.6%). However, NY smokers appeared no more likely to report noticing differences in cigarette taste, an intention to quit smoking, or to have made quit attempts. Conclusions: A significant minority of smokers in NY reported noticing changes in the performance of their cigarettes following the RIP law, as would be expected. However, the RIP law appears to have had no impact on the smoking habits of New Yorkers, countering arguments made by cigarette manufacturers that the law would impact consumer acceptability.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of the New York State cigarette fire safety standard on ignition propensity, smoke constituents, and the consumer marketTobacco Control, 2005
- Time to legislate for fire‐safe cigarettes in AustraliaThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2004
- The case for fire safe cigarettes made through industry documentsTobacco Control, 2002
- Fire Injuries, Disasters, and Costs from Cigarettes and Cigarette Lights: A Global OverviewPreventive Medicine, 2000
- How the tobacco industry continues to keep the home fires burningTobacco Control, 1999
- Modeling the ignition of soft furnishings by a cigarettePublished by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ,1993
- Test methods for quantifying the propensity of cigarettes to ignite soft furnishingsPublished by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) ,1993