A Descriptive Study of Situational and Individual Influences upon Individuals' Responses to Sexual Harassment
- 1 August 1996
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 49 (8) , 1105-1122
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900805
Abstract
Recently, Thacker and Ferris (1991) proposed a theoretical model in which they suggested that targets' responses to sexual harassment would be influenced by the nature of the working relationship between the target and the harasser, the type of harassment, and gender. The purpose of this study is to investigate these potential influences, as well as duration, another situational influence, upon two types of target response: complaint/refusal and avoidance/going along. Respondents are employees of the Federal government. Findings suggest that both situational and individual influences have differential effects upon target response. Implications for the design of user-friendly sexual harassment prevention policies are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- The concept of powerBehavioral Science, 2007
- Sexual Harassment: A Research Analysis and Agenda for the 1990sJournal of Vocational Behavior, 1993
- Sexual harassment: Violence against women in the workplace.American Psychologist, 1993
- PREDICTING SOCIAL-SEXUAL BEHAVIOR AT WORK: A CONTACT HYPOTHESIS.The Academy of Management Journal, 1990
- Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse statusSex Roles, 1987
- Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campusSex Roles, 1986
- Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work settingJournal of Vocational Behavior, 1983
- Stress effects of sexual harassment on the job: Implications for counseling.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis.Psychological Bulletin, 1981
- Power-Dependence RelationsAmerican Sociological Review, 1962