Label-mediated hostility generalization.

Abstract
Trained 60 male undergraduates to have a negative attitude toward a critical name, using the A. Staats and C. Staats (see 33:4) conditioning procedure. Semantic differential ratings demonstrated the success of the conditioning. Following this, 1/2 of the Ss were deliberately angered by the E, and then all went to a 2nd study in which they discussed an issue with 2 other men, 1 of whom bore the critical name. Ratings indicated that the Ss had been more hostile to the critically named confederate. The Ss' evaluations of their discussion partners' personalities showed: (1) a judgmental contrast effect, as if the 2 confederates were favorably contrasted with the obnoxious 1st E; and (2) a name-mediated hostility generalization. Unlike the nonthwarted Ss, the angered Ss were significantly more unfriendly to the negatively named confederate. (18 ref.) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: