Estimates of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevalence and Proportion Diagnosed Based on Bayesian Multiparameter Synthesis of Surveillance Data
Open Access
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society
- Vol. 171 (3) , 541-580
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985x.2007.00537.x
Abstract
Summary: Estimates of the number of prevalent human immunodeficiency virus infections are used in England and Wales to monitor development of the human immunodeficiency virus–acquired immune deficiency syndrome epidemic and for planning purposes. The population is split into risk groups, and estimates of risk group size and of risk group prevalence and diagnosis rates are combined to derive estimates of the number of undiagnosed infections and of the overall number of infected individuals. In traditional approaches, each risk group size, prevalence or diagnosis rate parameter must be informed by just one summary statistic. Yet a rich array of surveillance and other data is available, providing information on parameters and on functions of parameters, and raising the possibility of inconsistency between sources of evidence in some parts of the parameter space. We develop a Bayesian framework for synthesis of surveillance and other information, implemented through Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. The sources of data are found to be inconsistent under their accepted interpretation, but the inconsistencies can be resolved by introducing additional ‘bias adjustment’ parameters. The best-fitting model incorporates a hierarchical structure to spread information more evenly over the parameter space. We suggest that multiparameter evidence synthesis opens new avenues in epidemiology based on the coherent summary of available data, assessment of consistency and bias modelling.Keywords
Funding Information
- Medical Research Council (G0100230)
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Allowing for uncertainty due to missing data in meta‐analysis—Part 2: Hierarchical modelsStatistics in Medicine, 2007
- Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment ComparisonsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2006
- On Model Expansion, Model Contraction, Identifiability and Prior Information: Two Illustrative Scenarios Involving Mismeasured VariablesStatistical Science, 2005
- Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and FitJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2002
- Inference for Deterministic Simulation Models: The Bayesian Melding ApproachJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000
- Filtering via Simulation: Auxiliary Particle FiltersJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- Meta-Analysis of Migraine Headache Treatments: Combining Information from Heterogeneous DesignsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1999
- Updating Uncertainty in an Integrated Risk Assessment: Conceptual Framework and MethodsRisk Analysis, 1995
- The Effects of Long Term Zidovudine Therapy and Pneumocystis carinii Prophylaxis on HIV DiseaseDrugs, 1995
- Risk‐based environmental remediation: Decision framework and role of uncertaintyEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1994