Risks Associated with Low Doses and Low Dose Rates of Ionizing Radiation: Why Linearity May Be (Almost) the Best We Can Do
Top Cited Papers
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 251 (1) , 6-12
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2511081686
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation Biologic and Experimental DataRadiology, 2009
- Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in Patched heterozygous mouse cerebellumProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Increased Frequency of Chromosome Translocations Associated with Diagnostic X-Ray ExaminationsRadiation Research, 2008
- Absence of evidence for threshold departures from linear-quadratic curvature in the Japanese A-bomb cancer incidence and mortality dataInternational Journal of Low Radiation, 2004
- Gene expression changes in mouse brain after exposure to low‐dose ionizing radiationInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 2003
- Comparisons of lung tumour mortality risk in the Japanese A-bomb survivors and in the Colorado Plateau uranium miners: support for the ICRP lung modelInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 2002
- A cytogenetic analysis of the long-term effect of uranium mining on peripheral lymphocytes using the micronucleus–centromere assayInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 2001
- The risk of non-melanoma skin cancer incidence in the Japanese atomic bomb survivorsInternational Journal of Radiation Biology, 1997
- The US radium luminisers: a case for a policy of 'below regulatory concern'Journal of Radiological Protection, 1994
- Prenatal X-Ray Exposure and Childhood Cancer in TwinsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985