Comparison of dynamic image and pulsed Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation
- 1 January 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
- Vol. 18 (1) , 3-7
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870180103
Abstract
Dynamic image and pulsed Doppler ultrasonography were used to evaluate 104 potentially growth‐retarded fetuses. The two techniques were compared, and then used together to predict whether or not the neonate would be growth retarded. Both ultrasonic diagnostic techniques showed good correlation with neonatal outcome, but their combined use improved diagnostic accuracy.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ultrasonic measurement of fetal blood velocity wave form as a secondary diagnostic test in screening for intrauterine growth retardationJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1988
- Sonographic estimation of fetal weight and Doppler analysis of umbilical artery velocimetry in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation: A prospective studyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Intrauterine growth retardation: predictive value of US criteria for antenatal diagnosis.Radiology, 1986
- Umbilical artery blood flow characteristics in normal and growth‐retarded fetuses.BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Umbilical artery velocity waveforms and intrauterine growth retardationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Umbilical velocity wave ratios in human pregnancyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984
- Eenie, meenie, minie, mo … What do the data really show?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- Four- to seven-year evaluation in two groups of small-for-gestational age infantsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- The use of ultrasound in the detection of intrauterine growth retardation: A reviewJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1982
- NOMOGRAMS FOR PRECISE DETERMINATION OF BIRTH WEIGHT FOR DATESBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980