Concentration and Detection of Cryptosporidium Oocysts in Surface Water Samples by Method 1622 Using Ultrafiltration and Capsule Filtration
Open Access
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Applied and Environmental Microbiology
- Vol. 67 (3) , 1123-1127
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.67.3.1123-1127.2001
Abstract
The protozoan parasite Cryptosporidium parvumis known to occur widely in both source and drinking water and has caused waterborne outbreaks of gastroenteritis. To improve monitoring, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency developed method 1622 for isolation and detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water. Method 1622 is performance based and involves filtration, concentration, immunomagnetic separation, fluorescent-antibody staining and 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) counterstaining, and microscopic evaluation. The capsule filter system currently recommended for method 1622 was compared to a hollow-fiber ultrafilter system for primary concentration of C. parvum oocysts in seeded reagent water and untreated surface waters. Samples were otherwise processed according to method 1622. Rates of C. parvumoocyst recovery from seeded 10-liter volumes of reagent water in precision and recovery experiments with filter pairs were 42% (standard deviation [SD], 24%) and 46% (SD, 18%) for hollow-fiber ultrafilters and capsule filters, respectively. Mean oocyst recovery rates in experiments testing both filters on seeded surface water samples were 42% (SD, 27%) and 15% (SD, 12%) for hollow-fiber ultrafilters and capsule filters, respectively. Although C. parvum oocysts were recovered from surface waters by using the approved filter of method 1622, the recovery rates were significantly lower and more variable than those from reagent grade water. In contrast, the disposable hollow-fiber ultrafilter system was compatible with subsequent method 1622 processing steps, and it recovered C. parvum oocysts from seeded surface waters with significantly greater efficiency and reliability than the filter suggested for use in the version of method 1622 tested.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot analysis of a cryptosporidiosis outbreak on a United States Coast Guard cutter.The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1998
- Water-borne Cryptosporidiosis: Detection Methods and Treatment OptionsAdvances in Parasitology, 1998
- PROTOZOAL AGENTS: What Are the Dangers for the Public Water Supply?Annual Review of Medicine, 1997
- Endotoxin removal using 6,000 molecular weight cut-off polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and polysulfone (PS) hollow fiber ultrafilters.1996
- Surveillance for waterborne-disease outbreaks--United States, 1993-1994.1996
- Comparison of assays forCryptosporidium parvumoocysts viability after chemical disinfectionFEMS Microbiology Letters, 1996
- The removal of phages T1 and PP7, and poliovirus from fluids with hollow-fiber ultrafilters with molecular weight cut-offs of 50,000, 13,000, and 6000.1995
- The removal of phages T1 and PP7, and poliovirus from fluids with hollow-fiber ultrafilters with molecular weight cut-offs of 50 000, 13 000, and 6000Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 1995
- A Massive Outbreak in Milwaukee of Cryptosporidium Infection Transmitted through the Public Water SupplyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Ultrafiltration: an efficient second step for hepatitis A virus and poliovirus concentrationJournal of Virological Methods, 1989