Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data
- 31 March 2006
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Critical Care
- Vol. 21 (1) , 1-7
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2006.01.004
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Propensity score methods gave similar results to traditional regression modeling in observational studies: a systematic reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Delirium as a Predictor of Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care UnitJAMA, 2004
- Comparison of Cox and Gray’s survival models in severe sepsis*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- An Appraisal of Multivariable Logistic Models in the Pulmonary and Critical Care LiteratureChest, 2003
- Multilevel modelling of medical dataStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT InvestigatorsJAMA, 1996
- Does more intensive treatment of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly reduce mortality? Analysis using instrumental variablesPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter studyJAMA, 1993
- Multiple imputation in health‐are databases: An overview and some applicationsStatistics in Medicine, 1991
- APACHE IICritical Care Medicine, 1985