Primary systemic treatment of advanced Hodgkin’s disease with EVA (etoposide, vinblastine, doxorubicin): 10-year follow-up
Open Access
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Oncology
- Vol. 14 (2) , 268-272
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdg076
Abstract
Background: The most commonly used regimen for the treatment of advanced Hodgkin’s disease (HD) is ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine). Two of these components, bleomycin and dacarbazine, have defined toxicities such as pulmonary fibrosis and nausea/vomiting, and also uncertain single-drug activity. The EVA regimen (etoposide, vinblastine, doxorubicin) is an attempt to substitute a known active agent, etoposide, for bleomycin and dacarbazine. Patients and methods: A series of 51 patients with advanced HD without prior systemic therapy were treated. The series included 12 stage II patients with bulky (>10 cm) mediastinal tumors, 10 of whom received complementary radiation therapy. The remaining patients received EVA only. Response, duration of response, survival, toxicity and the efficacy of salvage therapy were evaluated in all patients. The median follow-up time was 111 months and permitted an assessment of the long-term effects of treatment and natural history of a cohort of treated patients. Results: EVA achieved a complete response (or clinical complete response) in 48/51 patients (94%). Of these 48 responders, 16 relapsed in a median of 11 months (range 3–48 months). In follow-up, 32/51 patients had no evidence of relapsed HD, although three died from other causes (two from vascular events and one from large cell lymphoma), resulting in progression-free survival for the entire group of 57% at 111 months. Eight of the 16 were alive and free from disease at follow-up at 111 months. In the entire series, only seven patients (14%) died of HD. 37 patients (73%) continued free from disease. There was no pulmonary toxicity. Conclusions: The EVA regimen appears to have an overall survival (OS) outcome comparable to ABVD, but without the lung toxicity. The high salvage rate of second-line therapy, in most instances at conventional dosage, suggests an absence of cross-resistance to alkylating agents in patients treated with EVA.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hybrid chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine (C-MOPP/ABV) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced hodgkin diseaseCancer, 2000
- MOPP/ABV hybrid chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkin's disease significantly improves failure-free and overall survival: the 8-year results of the intergroup trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Gonadal Function Following ABVD Therapy for Hodgkin's DiseaseAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Treatment of advanced Hodgkin's disease with chemotherapy--comparison of MOPP/ABV hybrid regimen with alternating courses of MOPP and ABVD: a report from the National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997
- Long-term complications of treatment and causes of mortality after Hodgkin's diseaseSeminars in Radiation Oncology, 1996
- Alternating versus hybrid MOPP and ABVD combinations in advanced Hodgkin's disease: ten-year results.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- Effect of ABVD chemotherapy with and without mantle or mediastinal irradiation on pulmonary function and symptoms in early-stage Hodgkin's disease.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1996
- A randomized study in stage IIIB and IV Hodgkin's disease comparing eight courses of MOPP versus an alteration of MOPP with ABVD: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lymphoma Cooperative Group and Groupe Pierre-et-Marie-Curie controlled clinical trial.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1994
- Chemotherapy of Advanced Hodgkin's Disease with MOPP, ABVD, or MOPP Alternating with ABVDNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Gonadal toxicity after combination chemotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. Comparative results of MOPP vs ABVDEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1985