Etiologies for Non-Correlating Cervical Cytologies and Biopsies

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
To investigate the etiologies for discrepancies between cervicovaginal smear and corresponding cervical biopsy results, 615 patients with cytologic diagnoses of dysplasia or malignancy during 1 year were reviewed. Sixty-nine patients (11%) were identified in which the cytologic and histologic diagnoses differed. Utilizing an algorithm developed for the study, these cases were assigned an etiologic category for discrepancy: colposcopic biopsy or cytologic sampling, cytologic screening, histotechnical processing, histologic or cytologic interpretation. The most common cause for a discrepancy was colposcopic biopsy sampling (36 cases, 51%). There were nine errors (13%) in biopsy interpretation, with seven underdiagnoses and two overdiagnoses. Eight errors (11%) in cytologic interpretation occurred, with half of these representing underdiagnoses. The other causes for discrepancy were less common—cytologic sampling (6 cases), histotechnical processing (3 cases), cytologic screening (2 cases), and a combination of factors (5 cases). Use of this algorithm allows laboratories to identify problem areas and design specific corrective protocols to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient care.

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: