Collective Fear, Individualized Risk: the social and cultural context of genetic testing forbreast cancer
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Nursing Ethics
- Vol. 7 (3) , 237-249
- https://doi.org/10.1177/096973300000700306
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide a critical examination of two aspects of culture and biomedicine that have helped to shape the meaning and practice of genetic testing for breast cancer. These are: (1) the cultural construction of fear of breast cancer, which has been fuelled in part by (2) the predominance of a ‘risk’ paradigm in contemporary biomedicine. The increasing elaboration and delineation of risk factors and risk numbers are in part intended to help women to contend with their fear of breast cancer. However, because there is no known cure or foolproof prevention for breast cancer, risk designations bring with them recommendations for vigilant surveillance strategies and screening guidelines. We argue that these in effect exacerbate women’s fears of breast cancer itself. The volatile combination of discourses of fear, risk and surveillance have significant ethical and social consequences for women’s lives and well-being. Genetic testing decisions are made within this context; if nurses understand this context they can play an important role in helping women to cope with the anxiety and fear of breast cancer risk.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Great expectations: historical perspectives on genetic breast cancer testing.American Journal of Public Health, 1999
- The impact of a brief coping skills intervention on adherence to breast self-examination among first-degree relatives of newly diagnosed breast cancer patientsPsycho‐Oncology, 1999
- Standards of Care and Ethical Concerns in Genetic Testing and ScreeningClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Breast Cancer Risk Analysis and CounselingClinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Perception of breast cancer risk among women in breast center and primary care settings: Correlation with age and family history of breast cancerSurgery, 1996
- Psychosocial and Ethical Implications of Defining Genetic Risk for CancersaAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1995
- The rise of surveillance medicineSociology of Health & Illness, 1995
- Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk and Screening Effectiveness in Women Younger Than 50 Years of AgeJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1995
- Risk as Moral Danger: The Social and Political Functions of Risk Discourse in Public HealthInternational Journal of Health Services, 1993
- Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined AnnuallyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1989