The medical treatment of secretory otitis media A clinical trial of three commonly used regimes
- 1 September 1977
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
- Vol. 91 (9) , 757-765
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022215100084334
Abstract
A clinical trial was undertaken to evaluate 3 medical treatments commonly used for chronic secretory otitis media. The treatments compared were ephedrine nose drops, an oral antihistamine and decongestant (Dimotapp) and autoinflation of the middle ear. Changes in middle ear compliance and pressure were used as objective criteria of the efficacy of treatment in addition to changes in pure-tone threshold and to clinical assessment. Symptoms and abnormal signs tended to remit during the trial but there was no evidence from pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry that any of the treatments was beneficial. The period of observation enabled 28% of the children to avoid surgical treatment. Good and bad prognostic features are described which should help in deciding whether to manage a case conservatively or whether to proceed directly to surgery.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Animal Litters as Experimental UnitsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics, 1972
- Autoinflation Treatment of Serous Otits Media in ChildrenThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1971
- Influence of an oral decongestant on Eustachian tube function in childrenJournal of Allergy, 1970
- The Use of the Electro-Acoustic Impedance Bridge in the Assessment of Middle Ear FunctionInternational Audiology, 1969
- A Method for Maintaining Middle-ear Ventilation in ChildrenThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 1968
- Secretory otitis media in children: A study of 540 childrenThe Laryngoscope, 1967
- Medical Treatment of Gastric UlcerScottish Medical Journal, 1964
- EFFECT OF SILVER PREPARATIONS AND ANTISEPTICS ON THE pH OF NASAL SECRETIONS IN SITUJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1941