Sentence comprehension limitations related to syntactic deficits in reading-disabled children
- 1 December 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Applied Psycholinguistics
- Vol. 5 (4) , 305-322
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716400005208
Abstract
Twenty reading-disabled children, ages 7 through 10, were compared with 20 nondisabled readers of the same age range according to their ability to interpret complex sentences. Using a relatively new metric, subjects were classified according to Grammar Type and the extent to which they obeyed the c-command constraint on control in interpreting sentences containing embedded complements with missing subjects. The results demonstrated that the nondisabled readers performed at higher levels of grammatical development than did the reading-impaired subjects; there was no effect for age. Implications are made regarding the structural nature of the syntactic deficit in the reading-disabled population studied.This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Control and the Thematic DomainLanguage, 1984
- Communicative skills and peer relations of learning disabled adolescentsTopics in Language Disorders, 1984
- Language disabilities in adolescentsTopics in Language Disorders, 1984
- Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clausesCognition, 1982
- Children’s memory for sentences and word strings in relation to reading abilityMemory & Cognition, 1980
- Rapid ‘automatized’ naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilitiesNeuropsychologia, 1976
- The Use of English Morphology by High-Risk and Learning Disabled ChildrenJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1973
- Reading comprehension and syntactic responses in good and poor readers.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973
- ‘CHILDREN ARE NICE TO UNDERSTAND’: SURFACE STRUCTURE CLUES FOR THE RECOVERY OF A DEEP STRUCTUREBritish Journal of Psychology, 1970
- Idiosyncratic response patterns among good and poor readers.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1966