Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Stage 0 Distal Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiation Therapy
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 240 (4) , 711-718
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000141194.27992.32
Abstract
Report overall long-term results of stage 0 rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation and compare long-term results between operative and nonoperative treatment. Two-hundred sixty-five patients with distal rectal adenocarcinoma considered resectable were treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) with 5-FU, Leucovorin and 5040 cGy. Patients with incomplete clinical response were referred to radical surgical resection. Patients with incomplete clinical response treated by surgery resulting in stage p0 were compared to patients with complete clinical response treated by nonoperative treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using chi2, Student t test and Kaplan-Meier curves. Overall and disease-free 10-year survival rates were 97.7% and 84%. In 71 patients (26.8%) complete clinical response was observed following CRT (Observation group). Twenty-two patients (8.3%) showed incomplete clinical response and pT0N0M0 resected specimens (Resection group). There were no differences between patient's demographics and tumor's characteristics between groups. In the Resection group, 9 definitive colostomies and 7 diverting temporary ileostomies were performed. Mean follow-up was 57.3 months in Observation Group and 48 months in Resection Group. There were 3 systemic recurrences in each group and 2 endorectal recurrences in Observation Group. Two patients in the Resection group died of the disease. Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 88% and 83%, respectively, in Resection Group and 100% and 92% in Observation Group. Stage 0 rectal cancer disease is associated with excellent long-term results irrespective of treatment strategy. Surgical resection may not lead to improved outcome in this situation and may be associated with high rates of temporary or definitive stoma construction and unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Letters to the EditorAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2003
- Importance of tumor regression assessment in predicting the outcome in patients with locally advanced rectal carcinoma who are treated with preoperative radiotherapyCancer, 2002
- Assessing The Predictive Value of Clinical Complete Response To Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: An Analysis of 488 PatientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery for locally advanced distal rectal adenocarcinomaDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001
- Stratifying risk factors for follow-upDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001
- Bladder and sexual dysfunction after mesorectal excision for rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Treatment Systems Guidelines for Primary Rectal Cancer From the 1996 Patterns of Care StudyInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1998
- Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in the Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcomeBritish Journal of Surgery, 1998
- Mesorectal excision for rectal cancerThe Lancet, 1993
- Occult hepatic metastases in colorectal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986