Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: the unreliability of clinical judgment, the necessity for evidence, and reasons to participate in a randomized trial
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal Of Neuroradiology
- Vol. 33 (4) , 211-219
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0150-9861(06)77266-2
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rates of Delayed Rebleeding From Intracranial Aneurysms Are Low After Surgical and Endovascular TreatmentStroke, 2006
- Long-Term Angiographic Recurrences After Selective Endovascular Treatment of Aneurysms With Detachable CoilsStroke, 2003
- Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured AneurysmsStroke, 2001
- Recommendations for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial AneurysmsStroke, 2000
- Mortality and Morbidity of Surgery for Unruptured Intracranial AneurysmsStroke, 1998
- Prevalence and Risk of Rupture of Intracranial AneurysmsStroke, 1998
- Initial and recurrent bleeding are the major causes of death following subarachnoid hemorrhage.Stroke, 1994
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage AxiomsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1961