Between the disclosure and foreclosure of erotic transference‐countertransference can psychoanalysis find a place for adult sexuality?
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Psychoanalytic Dialogues
- Vol. 8 (6) , 747-766
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10481889809539292
Abstract
In this article I explore the concept of a postoedipal adult sexuality and its role in the erotic transference‐countertransference processes seen in psychoanalytic treatment. This concept challenges the fundamental assumption that, whenever erotic feelings enter the psychoanalytic space, the analyst always stands in the role of the oedipal parent. It suggests that clinical choices made from within an oedipal model often fail to recognize certain significant developmental changes. An extended clinical example is provided.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reality and Danger in Psychoanalytic TreatmentThe Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 1998
- Mother—infant interaction structures and presymbolic self‐ and object representationsPsychoanalytic Dialogues, 1997
- Linking the “Pre-Analytic” with the PostclassicalContemporary Psychoanalysis, 1996
- A response to davies (but not the last word)Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 1994
- Love in the afternoon: A relational reconsideration of desire and dread in the countertransferencePsychoanalytic Dialogues, 1994