REPRESENTING RESPONDENTS UNDER NEW CIVIL COMMITMENT STATUTES: An Analysis of Counsel's Role In and Out of the Courtroom
- 1 October 1983
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Law & Policy
- Vol. 5 (4) , 438-454
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1983.tb00308.x
Abstract
Using quantifiable attorney behavior measures, instead of outcome measures, both before and during court hearings, this study attempts to evaluate legal representation under reform civil commitment procedures. Counsel representing involuntary commitment respondents full time were well prepared. Court appointed counsel, though better prepared than reported in studies done prior to reform, did not fully investigate their cases. Lack of adequate preparation was associated with a passive role and a non adversary position in court.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Court decisions in civil commitmentInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1981
- The Role of Counsel in Civil Commitment: Changes, Effects, and DeterminantsThe Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 1977
- Reformed Commitment Procedures: An Empirical Study in the CourtroomLaw & Society Review, 1977
- The Role of the Lawyer in the Mental Health FieldAmerican Bar Foundation Research Journal, 1977
- The Role of Counsel in the Civil Commitment Process: A Theoretical FrameworkThe Yale Law Journal, 1975
- Psychiatry and the Presumption of Expertise: Flipping Coins in the CourtroomCalifornia Law Review, 1974
- The Role of Counsel in Civil Commitment Proceedings: Emerging ProblemsCalifornia Law Review, 1974
- Involuntary hospitalization: Opinions and attitudes of psychiatrists and lawyersComprehensive Psychiatry, 1972
- The Effect of Legal Counsel on Admissions to a State Mental Hospital: A Confrontation of ProfessionsJournal of Health and Social Behavior, 1969