Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Monographs
- Vol. 66 (1) , 90-103
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376464
Abstract
As a result of the controversy over the dimensionality of the ethos/source credibility construct and the associated plethora of empirical studies in the 1960s and 1970s, Aristotle's dimension of “goodwill” has been dismissed by many contemporary theorists and researchers. It is argued that this occurred as a result of errors made in the earlier empirical research and that “goodwill” can be measured, contrary to earlier claims, and should be restored to its former status in rhetorical communication theory. Empirical research is reported indicating the existence of the goodwill dimension as part of the structure of the ethos/source credibility construct and a measure of that dimension is provided with evidence for its reliability and validity.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risky Business: Challenges in Vaccine Risk CommunicationPediatrics, 1998
- Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decadesCentral States Speech Journal, 1981
- Image of mass media news sourcesJournal of Broadcasting, 1975
- The factor structure of source credibility scales for immediate superiors in the organizational contextCentral States Speech Journal, 1974
- Dimensions of source credibility: A test for reproducibilitySpeech Monographs, 1973
- Scales for the measurement ofethos:Another attemptSpeech Monographs, 1972
- A second generation little jiffyPsychometrika, 1970
- The Dimensions of Source Credibility of Television NewscastersJournal of Communication, 1968
- Scales for the measurement of ethosSpeech Monographs, 1966
- A summary of experimental research in ethosSpeech Monographs, 1963