Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 25 January 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLoS Medicine
- Vol. 8 (1) , e1000393
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393
Abstract
Ian Sinha and colleagues advise that when using the Delphi process to develop core outcome sets for clinical trials, patients and clinicians be involved, researchers and facilitators avoid imposing their views on participants, and attrition of participants be minimized.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients’ and clinicians’ research prioritiesHealth Expectations, 2010
- Patient Perspective on Outcomes in Rheumatology — A Position Paper for OMERACT 9The Journal of Rheumatology, 2009
- Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Inhaled Corticosteroids for Children with Asthma Are Narrowly Focussed on Short Term Disease ActivityPLOS ONE, 2009
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting BiasPLOS ONE, 2008
- Identifying the clinical domains of fibromyalgia: Contributions from clinician and patient delphi exercisesArthritis Care & Research, 2008
- Standardising Outcomes in Paediatric Clinical TrialsPLoS Medicine, 2008
- A Systematic Review of Studies That Aim to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials in ChildrenPLoS Medicine, 2008
- Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviewsTrials, 2007
- OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatologyTrials, 2007
- Outcome Measures in Acute Stroke TrialsStroke, 2000