LIVING UNRELATED DONORS IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS
- 1 May 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 69 (9) , 1942-1945
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200005150-00033
Abstract
Given the severe organ shortage and the documented superior results obtained with living (vs. cadaver) donor kidney transplants, we have adopted a very aggressive policy for the use of living donors. Currently, we make thorough attempts to locate a living related donor (LRD) or a living unrelated donor (LURD) before proceeding with a cadaver transplant. We compared the results of our LURD versus LRD transplants to determine any significant difference in outcome. Between 1/1/84 and 6/30/98, we performed 711 adult kidney transplants with non-HLA-identical living donors. Of these, 595 procedures used LRDs and 116 used LURDs. Immunosuppression for both groups was cyclosporine-based, although LURD recipients received 5-7 days of induction therapy (antilymphocyte globulin or antithymocyte globulin), whereas LRD recipients did not. LURD recipients tended to be older, to have inferior HLA matching, and to have older donors than did the LRD recipients (all factors potentially associated with decreased graft survival). Short-term results, including initial graft function and incidence of acute rejection, were similar in the two groups. LURD recipients had a slightly higher incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (P=NS). We found no difference in patient and graft survival rates. However, the incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection was significantly lower among LURD recipients (16.7% for LRD recipients and 10.0% for LURD recipients at 5 years posttransplant; P=0.05). LRD recipients also had a greater incidence of late (>6 months posttransplant) acute rejection episodes than did the LURD recipients (8.6% vs. 2.6%, P=0.04). The exact reason for these findings is unknown. Although LURD recipients have poorer HLA matching and older donors, their patient and graft survival rates are equivalent to those of non-HLA-identical LRD recipients. The incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection is lower in LURD transplants. Given this finding and the superior results of living donor (vs. cadaver) transplants, a thorough search should be made for a living donor-LRD or LURD-before proceeding with a cadaver transplant.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Living unrelated renal donation: The University of Wisconsin experienceSurgery, 1998
- Chronic renal allograft rejection: Immunologic and nonimmunologic risk factorsKidney International, 1996
- Living Related and Unrelated Donors for Kidney Transplantation A 28-Year ExperienceAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Progress in Renal Transplantation A Single Center Study of 3359 Patients Over 25 YearsAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- THE HYPERFILTRATION HYPOTHESIS IN HUMAN RENAL TRANSPLANTATIONTransplantation, 1994
- SUCCESSFUL LONG-TERM OUTCOME WITH 0-HAPLOTYPE-MATCHED LIVING-RELATED KIDNEY DONORSTransplantation, 1994
- LRISK FACTORS FOR CHRONIC REJECTION IN RENAL ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTSTransplantation, 1993
- Renal Transplantation for the Nephrologist: Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: What Did We Learn During the 1980s? What Should We Learn During the 1990s?American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1991
- Living-Unrelated Renal Transplantation: Results in 40 PatientsAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 1988
- Use of Living Donors in Kidney Transplantation in ManArchives of Surgery, 1970