Bcl-2 Is a Prognostic Marker in Breast Cancer Independently of the Nottingham Prognostic Index
Open Access
- 15 April 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) in Clinical Cancer Research
- Vol. 12 (8) , 2468-2475
- https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-2719
Abstract
Purpose: Prognostication of breast cancer using clinicopathologic variables, although useful, remains imperfect. Many reports suggest that gene expression profiling can refine the current approach. Alternatively, it has been shown that panels of proteins assessed by immunohistochemistry might also be useful in this regard. We evaluate the prognostic potential of a panel of markers by immunohistochemistry in a large case series to establish if either a single marker or a panel could improve the prognostic power of the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI). We validated the results in an independent series. Experimental Design and Results: The expression of 13 biomarkers was evaluated in 930 breast cancers on a tissue microarray. Eight markers [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), Bcl-2, cyclin E, p53, MIB-1, cytokeratin 5/6, and HER2] showed a significant association with survival at 10 years on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis that included these eight markers and the NPI, only the NPI [hazard ratio (HR), 1.35; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.16-1.56; P = 0.0005], ER (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.88; P = 0.011), and Bcl-2 (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99; P = 0.055) were significant. In a subsequent multivariate analysis that included the NPI, ER, and Bcl-2, only Bcl-2 (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.44-0.87; P = 0.006) remained independent of NPI (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.16-1.56; P = 0.004). In addition, Bcl-2, used as a single marker, was more powerful than the use of a panel of markers. Based on these results, an independent series was used to validate the prognostic significance of Bcl-2. ER and PR were also evaluated in this validation series. Bcl-2 (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.96; P = 0.018) retained prognostic significance independent of the NPI (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.67-2.51; P < 0.001) with an effect that was maximal in the first 5 years. Conclusion: Bcl-2 is an independent predictor of breast cancer outcome and seems to be useful as a prognostic adjunct to the NPI, particularly in the first 5 years after diagnosis.Keywords
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular Classification and Molecular Forecasting of Breast Cancer: Ready for Clinical Application?Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- “Good Old” clinical markers have similar power in breast cancer prognosis as microarray gene expression profilersEuropean Journal Of Cancer, 2004
- A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancerNature, 2002
- The molecular outlookNature, 2002
- Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implicationsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001
- National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer, November 1-3, 2000JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumor specimensNature Medicine, 1998
- pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long‐term follow‐upHistopathology, 1991