Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 June 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Annual Reviews in Annual Review of Political Science
- Vol. 11 (1) , 497-520
- https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555
Abstract
Although empirical studies of deliberative democracy have proliferated in the past decade, too few have addressed the questions that are most significant in the normative theories. At the same time, many theorists have tended too easily to dismiss the empirical findings. More recently, some theorists and empiricists have been paying more attention to each other's work. Nevertheless, neither is likely to produce the more comprehensive understanding of deliberative democracy we need unless both develop a clearer conception of the elements of deliberation, the conflicts among those elements, and the structural relationships in deliberative systems.Keywords
This publication has 67 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Deliberative Democracy a Falsifiable Theory?Annual Review of Political Science, 2008
- Family Disputes: Diversity in Defining and Measuring DeliberationSwiss Political Science Review, 2007
- Does democratic deliberation change minds?Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 2006
- The Limits of Deliberative Discussion: A Model of Everyday Political ArgumentsThe Journal of Politics, 2006
- Context or Conflict Types: Which Determines the Selection of Communication ModeActa Politica, 2005
- Sequencing Deliberative MomentsActa Politica, 2005
- Measuring Publicity's Effect: Reconciling Empirical Research and Normative TheoryActa Politica, 2005
- The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: A Study of 16 Deliberative OrganizationsPolitical Communication, 2002
- Contract or Conversation? Theoretical Lessons from the Canadian Constitutional CrisisPolitics & Society, 1998
- Political Ideals and Political PracticeBritish Journal of Political Science, 1995