Why Causation Need not Follow From Statistical Association: Boundary Conditions for the Evaluation of Generative and Preventive Causal Powers
- 1 March 1999
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 10 (2) , 92-97
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00114
Abstract
In experimental design, a tacit principle is that to test whether a candidate cause c (i.e., a manipulation) prevents an effect e, e must occur at least some of the time without the introduction of c. This principle is the preventive analogue of the explicit principle of avoiding a ceiling effect in tests of whether c produces e. Psychological models of causal inference that adopt either the covariation approach or the power approach, among their other problems, fail to explain these principles. The present article reports an experiment that demonstrates the operation of these principles in untutored reasoning. The results support an explanation of these principles according to the power PC theory, a theory that integrates the previous approaches to overcome the problems that cripple each.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review, 1997
- Causal inferences as perceptual judgmentsMemory & Cognition, 1995
- The role of covariation versus mechanism information in causal attributionCognition, 1995
- Causal diagrams for empirical researchBiometrika, 1995
- Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model.Psychological Review, 1994
- Separating Causal Laws from Casual Facts: Pressing the Limits of Statistical RelevancePublished by Elsevier ,1993
- A probabilistic contrast model of causal induction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990
- Rules of Causal AttributionMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1982
- Evaluation of evidence in causal inference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1981
- A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasksBulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1980