Clinical experience with gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of vestibular schwannomas secondary to type 2 neurofibromatosis
Open Access
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Vol. 74 (9) , 1288-1293
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1288
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the results of stereotactic radiosurgery treating vestibular schwannomas secondary to type 2 neurofibromatosis. Methods: A retrospective review of 122 type 2 neurofibromatosis vestibular schwannomas consecutively treated in 96 patients. Tumour control was assessed by recourse to surgical intervention, by serial radiological imaging, and by the calculation of relative growth ratios in patients (n=29) habouring untreated contralateral tumours to act as internal controls. Hearing function was assessed with Gardner-Robertson grades and with averaged pure tone audiogram thresholds. Other complications are detailed. Results: Applying current techniques, eight years after radiosurgery it was estimated that 20% of patients will have undergone surgery for their tumour, 50% will have radiologically controlled tumours, and in 30% there will be some variable concern about tumour control, but up to that time they will have been managed conservatively. Relative growth ratios one and two years after treatment indicate that radiosurgery confers a significant (p=0.01) advantage over the natural history of the disease. Analysis of these ratios beyond two years was precluded by the need to intervene and radiosurgically treat the contralateral control tumours in more than 50% of the cases. This growth control was achieved with 40% of patients retaining their Gardner-Robertson hearing grades three years after treatment, (40% having some deterioration in grade, 20% becoming deaf). Pure tone audiogram results suggest some progressive long term hearing loss, although interpretation of this is difficult. Facial and trigeminal neuropathy occurred in 5% and 2%. Conclusions: Radiosurgery is a valuable minimally invasive alternative treatment for these tumours. For most patients, it controls growth or defers the need for surgery, or both. There is a price in terms of hearing function, although this may compare favourably with the deafness associated with the natural history of the disease, and with surgery. In deciding on therapy, patients should be aware of this treatment option.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Malignancy in a vestibular schwannoma. Report of a case with central neurofibromatosis, treated by both stereotactic radiosurgery and surgical excision, with a review of the literatureBritish Journal Of Neurosurgery, 2002
- Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Type 2 Neurofibromatosis Acoustic Neuromas: Patient Selection and Tumour SizeStereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, 2002
- Hearing restoration with auditory brainstem implants after radiosurgery for neurofibromatosis Type 2Journal of Neurosurgery, 2001
- Auditory brainstem implants: current neurosurgical experiences and perspectiveThe Journal of Laryngology & Otology, 2000
- Radiosurgery for bilateral neurinomas associated with neurofibromatosis type 2Surgical Neurology, 2000
- Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of acoustic neuromas associated with neurofibromatosis Type 2Journal of Neurosurgery, 1999
- Tumor Control after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Neurofibromatosis Patients with Bilateral Acoustic TumorsNeurosurgery, 1992
- A clinical study of type 2 neurofibromatosis.1992
- Bilateral cerebellopontine angle tumors in neurofibromatosis type 2Journal of Neurosurgery, 1991
- Hearing Preservation in Unilateral Acoustic Neuroma SurgeryAnnals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 1988