Major Hepatic Resection
- 1 February 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 132 (2) , 115-119
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430260013001
Abstract
Objective: To determine the indications for and outcomes of hepatic resection in a US hospital system. Design: A retrospective study of 444 consecutive hepatic resections (ie, 286 wedge or segmental resections and 158 lobectomies) using computerized medical records. Setting: All US Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals. Patients: US veterans (99% men). Intervention: Major hepatic resection. Main Outcome Measure: Survival, as determined by the absence of a death record. Results: One hundred fifty-eight lobectomies or larger resections were recorded (36% of the total); the 30-day operative mortality was 12% for lobectomies and 5% for wedge resections. However, the diagnosis had a greater influence on the operative mortality: 11 (4%) of 275 patients with colorectal metastases, 15 (21%) of 71 patients with hepatomas, 2 (9%) of 23 patients without cancer (but 0 [0%] of 7 patients with hemangiomas), 3 (12%) of 25 patients with cholangiocarcinomas, and 4 (8%) of 50 patients with metastases from other primary cancers. Approximately one third (ie, 92) of the patients who underwent a resection of their colorectal metastases underwent a concurrent colectomy, while the rest of the patients underwent these surgical procedures metachronously. The operative mortality was equal (ie, 4%) for the resection of synchronous vs metachronous colorectal metastases. The mean survival time after the resection of metachronous vs synchronous colorectal metastases was 34 months vs 30 months, respectively, and the projected 5-year survival after either procedure was 26%. The projected 5-year survival was 20% for patients with hepatoma and 8% for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. With uncommon pathologic types, the mean survival time after metastatic resection was longest for those with renal primary tumors (3 patients, 55 months). Conclusions: Hepatic resection is a safe and effective therapy for colorectal metastases (5-year survival, 26%) and hemangioma; hepatoma resection is dangerous (operative mortality, 21%) but effective (5-year survival, 20%). Arch Surg. 1997;132:115-119Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Whipple Resection for Cancer in U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- One Hundred Consecutive Hepatic ResectionsArchives of Surgery, 1994
- Regional chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: Thirty years without patient benefitJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1994
- Treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer with radioactive implantsCancer, 1994
- Comparison of Postoperative Mortality in VA and Private HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- One hundred patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer treated by resection: Analysis of prognostic determinantsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1991
- NATIONAL SOURCES OF VITAL STATUS INFORMATION: EXTENT OF COVERAGE AND POSSIBLE SELECTIVITY IN REPORTINGAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1990
- Surgical Treatment of Hepatic Metastases From Colorectal CancersArchives of Surgery, 1976
- Hepatic resection for metastatic cancerThe American Journal of Surgery, 1967
- Results of resection of metastatic tumors of the liverThe American Journal of Surgery, 1963