Variations in learning, motivation, and perceived immediacy between live and distance education classrooms
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Education
- Vol. 50 (3) , 230-240
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520109379250
Abstract
One‐hundred and twenty lower division and 49 upper division undergraduate students enrolled in a small Midwestern university were randomly assigned to three experimental educational settings: a live classroom, a video classroom, and an audio with Powerpoint display classroom. The lower division students viewed a brief lecture presented in the live classroom and simulcast to the other two settings. The upper division students viewed a 45 minute lecture presented in the live classroom and simulcast to the other two settings. The impact of the settings on participant learning, motivation, and perceived teacher immediacy was assessed in both studies. Perceived instructor immediacy was significantly higher for the live setting. For the longer lecture, motivation, perceived learning, affect toward the instructor, and willingness to enroll with instructor all varied significantly and were highest in the live setting. Actual short‐term learning varied significantly and was highest for the Powerpoint classroom. Student cognitive style was assessed, but the researchers found no significant variation based on this variable.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learningCommunication Education, 1998
- Associations between nonverbal behaviors and initial impressions of instructor competence and course content in videotaped distance education coursesCommunication Education, 1998
- Competence in Teaching at a DistanceNew Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1997
- Student-Centered Instruction for the Design of TelecoursesNew Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1997
- Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning, and curvilinearityCommunication Education, 1995
- Distance Education: Learning Outcomes, Interaction, and AttitudesJournal of Education for Library and Information Science, 1992
- A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and productCommunication Education, 1990
- The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learningCommunication Education, 1990
- The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learningCommunication Education, 1988
- A multidimensional scaling analysis of the “ideal interpersonal communication instructor”Communication Education, 1981