Cost-effectiveness analysis of oxaliplatin compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer in the US
- 15 March 2007
- Vol. 109 (6) , 1082-1089
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22512
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The MOSAIC trial demonstrated that oxaliplatin/5‐fluorouracil/leucovorin (FU/LV) (FOLFOX4) as adjuvant treatment of TNM stage II and III colon cancer significantly improves disease‐free survival compared with 5‐FU/LV alone. For stage III patients the 4‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) was 69% in the FOLFOX4 arm vs 61% in the LV5FU2 arm, P = .002). The cost‐effectiveness of FOLFOX4 in stage III patients was evaluated from a US Medicare perspective. METHODS. By using individual patient‐level data from the MOSAIC trial (median follow‐up: 44.2 months), DFS and overall survival (OS) were estimated up to 4 years from randomization. DFS was extrapolated from 4 to 5 years by fitting a Weibull model and subsequent survival was estimated from life tables. OS beyond 4 years was predicted from the extrapolated DFS estimates and observed survival after recurrence. Costs were calculated from trial data and external estimates of resources to manage recurrence. RESULTS. Patients on FOLFOX4 were predicted to gain 2.00 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63, 3.37) years of DFS over those on 5‐FU/LV. The predicted life expectancy of stage III patients on FOLFOX4 and 5‐FU/LV was 17.61 and 16.26 years, respectively. Mean total lifetime disease‐related costs were $56,300 with oxaliplatin and $39,300 with 5‐FU/LV. Compared with 5‐FU/LV, FOLFOX4 was estimated to cost $20,600 per life‐year gained and $22,800 per quality‐adjusted life‐year (QALY) gained, discounting costs and outcomes at 3% per annum. CONCLUSIONS. FOLFOX4 is likely to be cost‐effective compared with 5‐FU/LV in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio compares favorably with other funded interventions in oncology. Cancer 2007 © 2007 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Prevention: Strong Science and Real MedicineJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Use of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Health-Care Resource Allocation Decision-Making: How Are Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds Expected to Emerge?Value in Health, 2004
- A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin, Irinotecan, and Oxaliplatin Combinations in Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2004
- Management of Colorectal Cancer in Elderly PatientsDrugs & Aging, 2004
- Intensity of chemotherapy-induced emesis and overall survival as determinants of a global utility scoreSupportive Care in Cancer, 2002
- Willingness to Pay for a Quality-adjusted Life YearMedical Decision Making, 2000
- Cost Effectiveness of Adjuvant Intraportal Chemotherapy in Patients with Colorectal CancerJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 1996
- A Cost-Utility Analysis of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast CancerPharmacoEconomics, 1996
- A cost utility analysis of treatment options for gallstone disease: Methodological issues and resultsHealth Economics, 1994
- Levamisole and Fluorouracil for Adjuvant Therapy of Resected Colon CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990