Structural and evolutionary implications of the packaging of DNA for differentiation and proliferation in the lymphocyte
- 1 December 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Molecular Evolution
- Vol. 26 (3) , 173-179
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02099849
Abstract
During the differentiation of the clonally distributed lymphocytes of mouse and man into mature resting B and T cells, their DNA becomes tightly packed into dense heterochromatin masses and exhibits very little transcriptional activity; it also becomes extensively nicked, containing some 3000–4000 single-strand breaks per diploid genome. The nuclear matrix is sparse and poorly organized and there are but trace amounts of the matrix-linked enzyme DNA topoisomerase II; the nucleus of these small cells is surrounded by a thin rim of cytoplasm. The resting cell can thus be considered (by analogy to a sperm cell) as a vector for transporting tightly packed and relatively inert genetic information to all parts of the body. When the lymphocyte is stimulated to enter a proliferative cycle by binding of appropriately presented antigen or mitogen to relevant membrane receptors, the cell enlarges, due to increased synthesis of protein; the dense heterochromatin is pulled out into very small clumps, as a result of an enormous growth in size as well as complexity of the nuclear matrix, and a great increase in transcriptional activity occurs. We have identified four nuclear matrix antigens that are very widely conserved in the evolution of eucaryotes and that occupy distinctive domains in interphase nuclei. Of particular interest is antigen P1, detected in organisms ranging from algae to mammals. By virtue of its location at the interface between nuclear envelope and chromatin, we propose that it plays a major and evolutionarily conserved role in chromatin organization and orientation in all eucaryotic cell types. Prior to these events, the DNA strand breaks are rejoined by a mechanism dependent on poly(ADP ribose) synthetase; rejoining of the breaks is required in order for the cells to enter the S phase of the cell cycle. Under certain experimental conditions, the induction of DNA topoisomerase II is clearly seen to precede DNA replication; topoisomerase II may be involved in some of the nuclear changes of blastogenesis. The evidence suggests that induction of single-strand breaks in DNA may be a general feature in the evolution of differentiated somatic cells. The selective advantage of the endogenously produced DNA strand breaks may be to provide an additional mechanism that prevents the differentiated cell from replicating its genome in the absence of an appropriate proliferative signal.This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Early nuclear events in lymphocyte proliferationExperimental Cell Research, 1986
- DNA topoisomerase I and II activities during cell proliferation and the cell cycle in cultured mouse embryo fibroblast (C3H 10T1/2) cellsExperimental Cell Research, 1985
- DNA topoisomerase activities in concanavalin A‐stimulated lymphocytesFEBS Letters, 1984
- Regulation of repair of naturally occurring DNA strand breaks in lymphocytesBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1984
- DNA strand breaks in murine lymphocytes: Induction by purine and pyrimidine analoguesBiochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1983
- Changes in structure and composition of lymphocyte nuclei during mitogenic stimulationJournal of Ultrastructure Research, 1983
- Relationship between the fine structural organization of chromatin and nucleic acid synthesis in regenerating rat hepatocytesJournal of Ultrastructure Research, 1981
- Fine structure of chromatin as visualized in thin sections with the gautier selective stain for DNAJournal of Ultrastructure Research, 1979
- Regulation of Sodium and Potassium Transport in Phytohemagglutinin-Stimulated Human Blood LymphocytesJournal of Clinical Investigation, 1979
- DNA synthesis in rabbit spermatozoa after treatment with lysolecithin and fusion with somatic cellsExperimental Cell Research, 1972