Marital status, treatment, and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme
Open Access
- 29 August 2005
- Vol. 104 (9) , 1975-1984
- https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21399
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social factors influence cancer treatment choices, potentially affecting patient survival. In the current study, the authors studied the interrelations between marital status, treatment received, and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GM), using population‐based data. METHODS The data source was the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Public Use Database, 1988–2001, 2004 release, all registries. Multivariate logistic, ordinal, and Cox regression analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical variables were used. RESULTS Of 10,987 patients with GM, 67% were married, 31% were unmarried, and 2% were of unknown marital status. Tumors were slightly larger at the time of diagnosis in unmarried patients (49% of unmarried patients had tumors larger than 45 mm vs. 45% of married patients; P = 0.004, multivariate analysis). Unmarried patients were less likely to undergo surgical resection (vs. biopsy; 75% of unmarried patients vs. 78% of married patients) and were less likely to receive postoperative radiation therapy (RT) (70% of unmarried patients vs. 79% of married patients). On multivariate analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for resection (vs. biopsy) in unmarried patients was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.79–0.98; P = 0.02), and the OR for RT in unmarried patients was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.62–0.77; P < 0.001). Unmarried patients more often refused both surgical resection and RT. Unmarried patients who underwent surgical resection and RT were found to have a shorter survival than similarly treated married patients (hazard ratio for unmarried patients, 1.10; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Unmarried patients with GM presented with larger tumors, were less likely to undergo both surgical resection and postoperative RT, and had a shorter survival after diagnosis when compared with married patients, even after adjustment for treatment and other prognostic factors. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facets and determinants of quality of life in patients with recurrent high grade gliomaJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 2005
- Reason for Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Absence of Screening or Detection, or Breakdown in Follow-up?JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2004
- Consistency of Primary Brain Tumor Diagnoses and Codes in Cancer Surveillance SystemsNeuroepidemiology, 2004
- Racial differences in survival after diagnosis with primary malignant brain tumorCancer, 2003
- Studying Radiation Therapy Using SEER-Medicare-Linked DataMedical Care, 2002
- Predicting major depression in brain tumor patientsPsycho‐Oncology, 2002
- Social inequalities in cancer survivalPopulation Studies, 2000
- Survival rates in patients with primary malignant brain tumors stratified by patient age and tumor histological type: an analysis based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, 1973–1991Journal of Neurosurgery, 1998
- Factors Associated With Surgical and Radiation Therapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer in Older WomenJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Psychosocial Correlates of Survival in Advanced Malignant Disease?New England Journal of Medicine, 1985