Cholinergic modulation of an opposed effect of d-amphetamine and methylphenidate on the rearing response
- 1 January 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychopharmacology
- Vol. 43 (2) , 169-173
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00421020
Abstract
Rats given d-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) engage in frequent, short-duration rearing responses, whereas rats given methylphenidate (1 mg/kg) make less frequent, long-duration responses. The effects on this behavior of mixing d-amphetamine or methylphenidate with scopolamine or physostigmine suggest that this opposed action on rearing response duration is related to cholinergic-catecholaminergic balance. The anticholinergic agent scopolamine produces changes in rearing response duration similar to those produced by d-amphetamine, while the cholinergic agent physostigmine lengthens response duration and further potentiates this effect of methylphenidate.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interaction between cholinergic and catecholaminergic neurones in rat brainBrain Research, 1972
- Catecholamines in the Brain as Mediators of Amphetamine PsychosisArchives of General Psychiatry, 1972
- Dissociation of vertical and horizontal components of activity in rats treated with lithium chlorideCellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1972
- Attenuation of Stimulus Sensitivity induced by ScopolamineNature, 1971
- Influence of CNS Stimulants and Hallucinogens on Rats in Special CircumstancesPharmacopsychiatry, 1970
- THE EFFECTS OF METHYLPHENIDATE (RITALIN) ON THE MOTOR SKILLS AND BEHAVIOR OF CHILDREN WITH LEARNING PROBLEMSJournal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 1969
- Drugs in Management of Hyperkinetic and Perceptually Handicapped ChildrenPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1968
- A transistorized body capacitance relay for ecobehavioural studiesAnimal Behaviour, 1968
- New Tables for Multiple Comparisons with a ControlPublished by JSTOR ,1964
- Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behavior by the brain.Psychological Review, 1963