Abstract
A central assumption behind psychiatric diagnoses is that a disease has an objective existence in the world, whether discovered or not, and exists independently of the gaze of psychiatrists or anyone else. In other words, neolithic people had post›traumatic stress disorder as have people in all epochs since. However, the story of post›traumatic stress disorder is a telling example of the role of society and politics in the process of inven› tion rather than discovery. The diagnosis is a legacy of the American war in Vietnam and is a product of the post›war fortunes of the conscripted men who served there. They came home to find that they were being blamed for the war. Epithets like "babykiller" and "psychopath" were thrown at them by some who had watched on television the US military's atrocities against defence› less peasants. This reception was a primary factor in the well publicised difficulties—such as antisocial behaviour—that some military personnel had in readjusting to their peacetime roles. Those who were seen by psychiatrists were diagnosed as having an anxiety state, depression, substance misuse, personality disorder, or schizophrenia; these diagnoses were later supplanted by post›traumatic stress disorder. Early proponents of the diagnosis of post›traumatic
Keywords