‘Boomerang’ technique: An improved method for conformal treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer
- 30 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Australasian Radiology
- Vol. 48 (2) , 170-180
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01293.x
Abstract
The primary aim of the present study was to assess radiation dosimetry and subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer using a novel radiation technique termed the 'Boomerang'. Dosimetric comparisons were made with both conventional and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques. This is a study of 22 patients treated with this technique from June 1995 to October 1998. The technique used entailed delivery of 36 Gy in 18 fractions via parallel opposed fields, then 24 Gy in 12 fractions via asymmetric rotating arc fields for a total of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. Patients also received induction and concurrent chemotherapy. The radiation dosimetry was excellent. Dose-volume histograms showed that with the arc fields, 90% of the planning target volume received 94% of the prescribed dose. Relative to other conventional radiation therapy off-cord techniques, the Boomerang technique results in a 27% greater proportion of the prescribed dose being received by 90% of the planning target volume. This translates into an overall 10% greater dose received for the same prescribed dose. At 3 years, the actuarial loco-regional control rate, the failure-free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 91, 75 and 91%, respectively. At 5 years, the actuarial loco-regional control rate, the failure-free survival rate and the overall survival rate were 74, 62 and 71%, respectively. The Boomerang technique provided excellent radiation dosimetry with correspondingly good loco-regional control rates (in conjunction with chemotherapy) and very acceptable acute and late toxicity profiles. Because treatment can be delivered with conventional standard treatment planning and delivery systems, it is a validated treatment option for centres that do not have the capability or capacity for IMRT. A derivative of the Boomerang technique, excluding the parallel opposed component, is now our standard for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer when IMRT is not available.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concurrent Chemotherapy-Radiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Progression-Free Survival Analysis of a Phase III Randomized TrialJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Comparison of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment techniques for nasopharyngeal carcinomaInternational Journal of Cancer, 2001
- Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1999
- Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: Determinants of local and regional controlInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1997
- Preliminary results of a randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin, epirubicin, bleomycin) plus radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in stage IV (≥N2, M0) undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A positive effect on progression-free survivalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1996
- A prospective randomized study of chemotherapy adjunctive to definitive radiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomaInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Impact of changes in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an experience of 30 yearsRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1995
- Asymmetric ARC technique for posterior pharyngeal wall and retropharyngeal space tumorsInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1995
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: local control by megavoltage irradiationThe British Journal of Radiology, 1993
- Carcinoma of the nasopharynx: factors affecting prognosisInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1992