Crucifixion stories, the 1869 Caste War of Chiapas, and negative consciousness: a disruptive subaltern study
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Ethnologist
- Vol. 24 (2) , 331-354
- https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1997.24.2.331
Abstract
In this article I apply the methodology of the Subaltern Studies group, especially Ranajit Guha's theory of negative consciousness, to an instance of indigenous insurgency in Mesoamerica. During the Caste War of Chiapas, 1867–69, the Maya apparently crucified a boy and, emboldened by this “Indian Christ,” they swept out of the hills killing non‐Indians indiscriminately. I argue not only that Guha's “elementary aspects of peasant insurgency” (1983) aid in understanding the ferocious mimesis of the Mayan crucifixion, but also that the Caste War has a disruptive history that challenges theories of resistance as well as the relation of the historian and the ethnographer to the subaltern and to the “colonizer” subject.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Maya Hackers and the Cyberspatialized Nation-State: Modernity, Ethnostalgia, and a Lizard Queen in GuatemalaCultural Anthropology, 1996
- Tactility and DistractionCultural Anthropology, 1991
- Jacques LacanPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1990
- Plotting WomenPublished by Columbia University Press ,1989
- For an Indian History of Peasant StruggleSocial Scientist, 1988
- Permanent Counterinsurgency in GuatemalaTelos, 1987