Finding the best abdominal closure: An evidence-based review of the literature
- 30 April 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Current Surgery
- Vol. 62 (2) , 220-225
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2004.08.014
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of abdominal-wound closure technique on complications after surgery: a randomised studyThe Lancet, 1999
- The healing of laparotomies: review of the literatureHernia, 1998
- Is closure of the peritoneal layer necessary in the repair of midline surgical abdominal wounds?World Journal of Surgery, 1990
- Lateral paramedian incisionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- A Randomized Prospective Study of 571 Patients Comparing Continuous vs. Interrupted Suture TechniquesAnnals of Surgery, 1983
- The lateral paramedian incision—experience with 850 casesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Does the type of suture material contribute to the strength of the lateral paramedian incision?British Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Does the peritoneum need to be closed at laparotomy?British Journal of Surgery, 1977
- A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy woundsBritish Journal of Surgery, 1975
- Layered and mass closure of the abdominal wall: A theoretical and experimental analysisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1970