A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 168 (3) , 842-847
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90831-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Limitations of antenatal fetal heart rate monitorsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990
- Reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readingsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1988
- Patterns of human fetal heart rate accelerations from 26 weeks to termAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987
- Interpretation of nonstress testsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Validity of mathematical methods of quantitating fetal heart rate variabilityAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- The nonstress test as a diagnostic test: A critical reappraisalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Improvements in the registration and analysis of fetal heart rate records at the bedsideBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1985
- Factors involved in the interpretation of fetal monitor tracingsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1985
- Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocogramsAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1982
- Baseline in human fetal heart‐rate recordsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982