Screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies in the first trimester: an update of the impact of chorionicity on maternal serum markers
- 10 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 28 (1) , 49-52
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.1923
Abstract
Objective: To examine the distribution of first‐trimester biochemical markers of aneuploidy in twin pregnancies, and to assess whether there are differences in the distributions between monochorionic and dichorionic twins.Methods: Maternal serum‐free β‐hCG and PAPP‐A were measured between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks as part of a routine first‐trimester screening program in conjunction with fetal nuchal translucency (NT) performed at two sites. Data from twin pregnancies were extracted from the fetal databases along with information on the chorionicty. The individual marker concentrations were expressed as weight corrected, ethnicity corrected, smoking corrected and IVF corrected MoM using data from singleton pregnancies as the reference. The overall medians were compared to those in singleton pregnancies and between monochorionic and dichorionic twins.Results: Data was available from 1914 sets of twins. Of these, 1214 had information with respect to chorionicity, with 1024 being dichorionic and 190 being monochorionic. The overall median weight corrected, ethnicity corrected, smoking corrected and IVF corrected MoM amongst twin pregnancies were 2.023 for free β‐hCG (sd log10 MoM = 0.2611 and 2.121 for PAPP‐A (sd log10 MoM = 0.2255)—both medians were significantly greater than the medians in singleton pregnancies (1.00 MoM). In the case of monochorionic and dichorionic twins the median weight corrected, ethnicity corrected, smoking corrected and IVF corrected, free β‐hCG MoM's were not significantly different (1.983 v 2.041), however for PAPP‐A the median weight corrected, ethnicity corrected, smoking corrected and IVF corrected MoM in monochorionic twins was significantly lower than in dichorionic twins (1.756 v 2.250) whilst the sd log10 MoM's were not significantly different (0.2185 v 0.2167).Conclusion: Screening in twin pregnancies requires adjustment of the calculated MoM to account for the presence of two fetuses. In general, for free β‐hCG, this should be by dividing the observed corrected MoM by 2.023. For PAPP‐A two different factors are required − 2.192 in dichorionic twins and 1.788 in monochorionic twins. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancy: does the addition of biochemistry make an improvement?Prenatal Diagnosis, 2005
- Multicenter study of first‐trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk‐orientated two‐stage first‐trimester screeningUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2005
- Maternal serum human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A in twin pregnancies in the first trimesterPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- First-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in singleton pregnancies achieved by assisted reproductionHuman Reproduction, 2001
- First trimester maternal serum free β human chorionic gonadotrophin and pregnancy associated plasma protein A as predictors of pregnancy complicationsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000
- Down's syndrome screening in twinsJournal of Medical Screening, 1998
- Evolution of the lambda or twin-chorionic peak sign in dichorionic twin pregnanciesPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1998
- Screening for trisomy 21 in twin pregnancies by maternal age and fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks of gestationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- The lambda sign at 10–14 weeks of gestation as a predictor of chorionicity in twin pregnanciesUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1996
- Early and simple determination of chorionic and amniotic type in multifetal gestations in the first fourteen weeks by high-frequency transvaginal ultrasonographyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994