News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Political Communication
- Vol. 13 (4) , 455-468
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1996.9963131
Abstract
Journalists in the Western democracies define themselves primarily as news professionals who are committed to a form of journalism marked by its objectivity and political neutrality. Yet they are also partisan actors whose political beliefs affect their news decisions. This conclusion is backed by evidence from a survey of journalists in five countries: the United States, Great Britain, Germany, Italy, and Sweden. In all five countries, there is a significant correlation between journalists’ personal beliefs and their news decisions. The relationship is strongest in news systems where partisanship is an acknowledged component of daily news coverage and is more pronounced among newspaper journalists than broadcast journalists, but partisanship has a modest impact on news decisions in all arenas of daily news, even those bound by law or tradition to a policy of political neutrality.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bad News, Bad GovernanceThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1996
- Chain Newspaper Homogeneity and Presidential Endorsements, 1972–1988Journalism Quarterly, 1989
- Bloodhounds or Missionaries: Role Definitions of German and British JournalistsEuropean Journal of Communication, 1986
- Comparative Indicators for the Way British and German Journalists Define Their Relations to the PublicInternational Communication Gazette, 1983