WHY SMALL GROUPS AND LOW INCOME SECTORS OBTAIN SUBSIDIES: THE “ALTRUISTIC” SIDE OF A “SELF‐INTERESTED” GOVERNMENT*
- 1 November 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economics & Politics
- Vol. 5 (3) , 285-293
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.1993.tb00080.x
Abstract
We develop a model of political support seeking politicians and support supplying voters. Based on Downs' original formulation, the framework yields endogenous political weights with both liberal and conservative properties. Our model reconciles the apparent contradiction between models of self‐interested politicians and of governments motivated by social concerns. We show that the “altruistic” aspect of government behavior is consistent with its “self‐interested” behavior. We determine that the Olson‐Becker pressure group model is not unique. An increase in deadweight costs reduces the equilibrium subsidy. Smaller groups receive a larger per capita subsidy. These results are consistent with Becker's model.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Probabilistic Voting TheoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1992
- Explaining Price Policy Bias in Agriculture: The Calculus of Support‐Maximizing PoliticiansAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991
- The Political Economy of Trade PolicyJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1989
- A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political InfluenceThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1983
- Pareto optimality of policy proposals with probabilistic votingPublic Choice, 1982
- Toward a More General Theory of RegulationThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1976
- Towards a mathematical model of government behaviourJournal of Economics, 1968
- The Logic of Collective ActionPublished by Harvard University Press ,1965
- Competition and DemocracyThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1958