Response Alternatives in Likert Scaling
- 1 September 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 44 (3) , 563-567
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164484443003
Abstract
Over the past several years, numerous questions have arisen pertaining to response alternatives for Likert scaling. Specifically, both two-column and one-column Likert formats are commonly used in educational and psychological measurement. Which format, however, is to be preferred? Is one format superior to the other and under what restraints? This study makes a start toward clarifying these issues by analyzing the results of applying two different methods of Likert-scale construction (single-column and discrepancy-column formats). The findings indicate that the discrepancy format clearly provides stronger discrimination for purposes of measuring need than does the single-column approach.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Graphic rating scales — How many categories?British Journal of Psychology, 1978
- Methodological advances in the validation of inventory items, scales, profiles and interpretationsJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1978
- A Monte Carlo study of factors affecting three indices of composite scale reliability.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977
- Attitudinal Points of Agreement and DisagreementThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1972
- Attitude Measurement and Prediction of Behavior: An Evaluation of Conditions and Measurement TechniquesSociometry, 1967