Medical Journals and Medical Reporting
- 1 June 2000
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 342 (22) , 1668-1671
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200006013422212
Abstract
The public appetite for health information seems insatiable, as evidenced by the daily appearance in the news media of stories touting new medical breakthroughs, the proliferation of health-related Web sites, and the growth of direct-to-consumer pharmaceutical advertising.1 So important has media coverage of medical research become that many believe it sets the agenda not only for the public, but also for researchers and physicians.2 There is substantial concern that coverage of medicine by the news media is of uneven quality and that it sometimes misleads as much as it informs. In this issue of the Journal, Moynihan and colleagues report . . .Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Coverage by the News Media of the Benefits and Risks of MedicationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Medicine and the MediaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Prepublication Release ofJournalArticlesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-part 2The Lancet, 1996
- The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-part 1The Lancet, 1996
- The Internet and theJournalNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Violations of the Embargo and a New Policy on Early PublicityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- The Ingelfinger Rule RevisitedNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Importance of the Lay Press in the Transmission of Medical Knowledge to the Scientific CommunityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Science and the Media: The Boundaries of TruthHealth Affairs, 1985