A Comparison of Evoked Response Audiometry and Routine Clinical Audiometry
- 1 January 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Audiology
- Vol. 11 (3-4) , 238-243
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00206097209089302
Abstract
Auditory thresholds were determined by evoked response audiometry (ERA) and by routine clinical audiometry at two frequencies (500 and 2 000 Hz) for 50 adult patients by five audiologists. The differences between ERA results and routine audiometric results in this study suggest caution in the clinical use of data obtained by ERA.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aspects of Acoustically Evoked Responses: Inter-Judge and Intra-Judge ReliabilityJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1971
- Evoked Response Tests With Mentally RetardedJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1968
- Measurement of Auditory Threshold with a Special Purpose Analog ComputerJournal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1961
- Temporal Evannation: a New Approach in Diagnostic AudiologyJournal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1960