SIROLIMUS RESCUE THERAPY FOR REFRACTORY REJECTION IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1,2
- 1 June 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Transplantation
- Vol. 71 (11) , 1579-1584
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200106150-00016
Abstract
Acute renal allograft rejection episodes refractory to antilymphocyte preparations almost inevitably progress to transplantation loss. To reverse ongoing rejection processes, we administered sirolimus (RAPA) after failure of conventional immunosuppressive regimens including full courses of antilymphocyte sera. All 36 renal transplantation recipients reported herein displayed either Grade IIB or Grade III biopsy-proven (Banff 1993 criteria) ongoing rejection episodes despite prior treatment with pulse and/or oral recycling of steroids and at least one 14- to 21-day course of murine (OKT3) or equine (ATGAM) antilymphocyte treatment. We compared the actual 12-month outcomes of two demographically similar cohorts of patients treated for refractory rejection with RAPA (Group I; n=24) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; Group II; n=12) added to a baseline regimen of cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisone (Pred). Rescue therapy reversed the renal dysfunction in 96% of patients in the RAPA group versus 67% in the MMF group (P=0.03) despite the fact that a greater fraction of patients in the RAPA (17 of 24) than the MMF group (6 of 12) had experienced two or more episodes of acute rejection before study entry and the fact that the recurrent bouts of acute rejection occurred within the first 6 months posttransplant in 94% of patients in the RAPA group compared with 50% (P=0.005) in the MMF group. Among the patients who were reversed successfully, the rates of rebound acute rejection were similar (4% vs. 8%). The mean serum creatinine values were slightly, although not significantly, lower among RAPA than MMF patients at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months: namely, 2.6 vs. 2.8, 2.8 vs. 3.2, 3.0 vs. 3.3, and 2.8 vs. 3.2 mg/dL, respectively. The 1-year patient and graft survival rates were similar: namely, 88% vs. 92% and 83% vs. 67% for the RAPA versus MMF groups. RAPA is a potent immunosuppressive agent for the treatment of refractory renal allograft rejection.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE EFFECTS AND SAFETY OF A SIROLIMUS/CYCLOSPORINE COMBINATION REGIMEN FOR RENAL TRANSPLANTATION1Transplantation, 1998
- A MULTICENTER TRIAL OF FK506 (TACROLIMUS) THERAPY IN REFRACTORY ACUTE RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTIONTransplantation, 1996
- MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL FOR THE TREATMENT OF REFRACTORY, ACUTE, CELLULAR RENAL TRANSPLANT REJECTION1Transplantation, 1996
- CASE REPORT-SIROLIMUS RESCUE THERAPY FOR REFRACTORY RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION1Transplantation, 1996
- REVERSAL OF ONGOING HEART, KIDNEY, AND PANCREAS ALLOGRAFT REJECTION AND SUPPRESSION OF ACCELERATED HEART ALLOGRAFT REJECTION IN THE RAT BY RAPAMYCINTransplantation, 1993
- International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: The Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathologyKidney International, 1993
- ANALYSES OF THE UNOS SCIENTIFIC RENAL TRANSPLANT REGISTRY AT THREE YEARS—EARLY EVENTS AFFECTING TRANSPLANT SUCCESS1–3Transplantation, 1992
- Effects of cyclosporin, FK506, and rapamycin on graft-vessel diseaseThe Lancet, 1991
- PRECLINICAL EVALUATION OF A NEW POTENT IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT, RAPAMYCINTransplantation, 1991
- SYNERGISTIC INTERACTIONS OF CYCLOSPORINE AND RAPAMYCIN TO INHIBIT IMMUNE PERFORMANCES OF NORMAL HUMAN PERIPHERAL BLOOD LYMPHOCYTES IN VITROTransplantation, 1991