Understanding influences on smoking in Bangladeshi and Pakistani adults: community based, qualitative study
Open Access
- 3 May 2003
- Vol. 326 (7396) , 962
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7396.962
Abstract
Objective: To gain detailed understanding of influences on smoking behaviour in Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities in the United Kingdom to inform the development of effective and culturally acceptable smoking cessation interventions. Design: Qualitative study using community participatory methods, purposeful sampling, one to one interviews, focus groups, and a grounded approach to data generation and analysis. Setting: Newcastle upon Tyne, during 2000-2. Participants: 87 men and 54 women aged 18–80 years, smokers and non-smokers, from the Bangladeshi and Pakistani communities. Results: Four dominant, highly inter-related themes had an important influence on smoking attitudes and behaviour: gender, age, religion, and tradition. Smoking was a widely accepted practice in Pakistani, and particularly Bangladeshi, men and was associated with socialising, sharing, and male identity. Among women, smoking was associated with stigma and shame. Smoking in women is often hidden from family members. Peer pressure was an important influence on smoking behaviour in younger people, who tended to hide their smoking from elders. There were varied and conflicting interpretations of how acceptable smoking is within the Muslim religion. Tradition, culture, and the family played an important role in nurturing and cultivating norms and values around smoking. Conclusion: Although there are some culturally specific contexts for smoking behaviour in Bangladeshi and Pakistani adults—notably the influence of gender and religion—there are also strong similarities with white people, particularly among younger adults. Themes identified should help to inform the development and appropriate targeting of smoking cessation interventions. What is already known on this topic Smoking is common among Bangladeshi and Pakistani men in Britain but rare among the women Smoking is particularly common in Bangladeshi men Socioeconomic status is thought to influence smoking uptake in Bangladeshi men Influences on smoking in South Asians in Britain are poorly understood What this study adds Smoking among Pakistani and Bangladeshi men is strongly seen as socially acceptable—a “normal” part of being a man Smoking in Bangladeshi men is more deeply socially ingrained than in Pakistanis, contributing to group cohesion and identity Smoking in Bangladeshi and Pakistani women is associated with a strong sense of cultural taboo, stigma, and non-acceptance Islam forbids addiction and intoxicants, but opinions differ on whether the Muslim religion allows smoking Culturally sensitive smoking cessation interventions for Bangladeshis and Pakistanis are neededKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knowing the risk: relationships between risk behaviour and health knowledge.Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory ,2001
- Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an updateThorax, 2000
- Heterogeneity of coronary heart disease risk factors in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, and European origin populations: cross sectional studyBMJ, 1999
- Minority ethnic community participation in needs assessment and service development in primary care: perceptions of Pakistani and Bangladeshi people about psychological distressHealth Expectations, 1999
- Smoking Cessation Guidelines for Health Professionals---A guide to effective smoking cessation interventions for the health care systemThorax, 1998
- Qualitative study of patients' perceptions of doctors' advice to quit smoking: implications for opportunistic health promotionBMJ, 1998
- Smoking cessation programmes targeted at black and minority ethnic communities.1996
- Cancer and ethnic minorities--the Department of Health's perspective.1996
- Cancer in minority ethnic populations: priorities from epidemiological data.1996
- British smoking and drinking habits: variations by country of birthJournal of Public Health, 1986