Ligand and structure-based methodologies for the prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor ligands
- 16 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
- Vol. 23 (11) , 747-754
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-008-9218-3
Abstract
Summary Accurate in silico models for the quantitative prediction of the activity of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands would greatly facilitate the process of drug discovery and development. Several methodologies have been developed based on the properties of the ligands, the direct study of the receptor–ligand interactions, or a combination of both approaches. Ligand-based three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationships (3D-QSAR) techniques, not requiring knowledge of the receptor structure, have been historically the first to be applied to the prediction of the activity of GPCR ligands. They are generally endowed with robustness and good ranking ability; however they are highly dependent on training sets. Structure-based techniques generally do not provide the level of accuracy necessary to yield meaningful rankings when applied to GPCR homology models. However, they are essentially independent from training sets and have a sufficient level of accuracy to allow an effective discrimination between binders and nonbinders, thus qualifying as viable lead discovery tools. The combination of ligand and structure-based methodologies in the form of receptor-based 3D-QSAR and ligand and structure-based consensus models results in robust and accurate quantitative predictions. The contribution of the structure-based component to these combined approaches is expected to become more substantial and effective in the future, as more sophisticated scoring functions are developed and more detailed structural information on GPCRs is gathered.Keywords
This publication has 91 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Applicability of GPCR Homology Models to Computer-Aided Drug Discovery: A Comparison between In Silico and Crystal Structures of the β2-Adrenergic ReceptorJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2008
- High-Resolution Crystal Structure of an Engineered Human β 2 -Adrenergic G Protein–Coupled ReceptorScience, 2007
- How many drug targets are there?Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2006
- Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations with Restraining PotentialsBiophysical Journal, 2006
- Predictions of CCR1 Chemokine Receptor Structure and BX 471 Antagonist Binding Followed by Experimental ValidationJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2006
- Successful Virtual Screening for a Submicromolar Antagonist of the Neurokinin-1 Receptor Based on a Ligand-Supported Homology ModelJournal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2004
- Seven-transmembrane receptorsNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 2002
- SCORE: A New Empirical Method for Estimating the Binding Affinity of a Protein-Ligand ComplexJournal of Molecular Modeling, 1998
- A Fast Flexible Docking Method using an Incremental Construction AlgorithmJournal of Molecular Biology, 1996
- Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvationJournal of Molecular Biology, 1995